Featured Articles

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

We wanted to learn a bit more about Qualcomm's plans for wearables and it turns out that the company believes its…

More...
Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

We had a chance to talk to Michelle Leyden-Li, Senior Director of Marketing, QCT at Qualcomm and get an update on…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 02 July 2013 10:52

Intel gets downgraded

Written by Nick Farrell

Analyst does not like its plans

Piper Jaffray’s Gus Richard does not seem to think that Chipzilla is going anywhere fast. He just said that the company was going to underperform and that its shares should be worth $20.

Richard said that Intel was just investing in fabs and process technology that is likely to result in diminishing returns. He was also concerned that Apple has signed a long-rumoured chip deal with TSMC to move some production away from Samsung Electronics.

The three year foundry agreement is for 20nm, 16nm and 10nm and it now appears that Intel will get any of Apple’s business in the short term. Richard wrote that it is highly unlikely for Samsung to broadly adopt Intel’s CPUs in its smartphones or tablets which shuts the door on the high-end mobile market for Intel for the foreseeable future.

Despite Intel’s lead in chip technology, Richard actually thinks TSMC, IBM and others pose a credible threat, in part because Intel doesn’t have the right intellectual property to fill the fabs.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments